Just three weeks
before the election, the two Democrats
running for the Arizona Corporation Commission have
laid their cards on the table, and it's not a
winning hand for the state's electric utilities or
their customers.Nina Trasoff and Mark Manoil have
sent voters a four-page brochure claiming the
current Corporation Commission has been catering to
out-of-state investors building power plants in
Arizona that have been sucking up our natural gas,
polluting our air and running ugly transmission
lines across the desert in order to make fat profits
by shipping electricity to California.
"Help short-circuit the plan to send our power to
California," the brochure pleads. "Vote Nina Trasoff
and Mark Manoil for Corporation Commission." The
brochure refers voters to a Web site,
www.ProtectOurPower.com, which details the
commission's approval in recent years of a number of
new power plants in and around the Valley.
Trasoff and Manoil say the commission should have
put tighter environmental and marketing restrictions
on the new plants to cut pollutants and ensure
Arizonans get lower rates, while also mandating that
20 percent of new power come from renewable sources
such as solar and wind.
Trasoff and Manoil's history and energy lesson is
selective to the point of being deceptive. They
don't mention that just three years ago the entire
Southwest was facing a serious energy shortage that
resulted in rolling blackouts in California. Arizona
has avoided similar problems primarily by rejecting
environmental and power-plant siting policies that
are overly restrictive.
Yet the Democratic candidates say the Arizona
Corporation Commission should use California's
environmental policies - the same policies that
helped foment that state's energy crisis - as a
model for Arizona's future. That would be a huge
mistake.
Arizona already has strong environmental
regulations when it comes to power plants. Those
that have been built the past few years, many of
them west and south of the Valley, are among the
cleanest in operation. Even the expansions of two
existing power plants in the East Valley will result
in a net reduction in air pollution.
Trasoff and Manoil's claim that Arizona is being
used by the big power generators as an "energy
colony" of California is also disingenuous. Power
generating facilities throughout the West are
interconnected in a giant grid of transmission
lines. This ensures reliability throughout the grid
as supply and demand fluctuate seasonally and due to
emergencies and maintenance outages in various
locations.
Furthermore, it's ludicrous to claim Arizona is
California's "energy colony" when much of Arizona's
gasoline, diesel and aviation fuel comes from
California oil refineries via pipeline. The rest
comes from Texas, which also supplies Arizona's
natural gas.
Yes, the Corporation Commission needs to look out
for Arizona's consumers and our environment. But we
see no evidence the present commission is shirking
either responsibility. Indeed, this commission is
one of the most able in Arizona's history in terms
of grasping complex energy issues and crafting
responsible, workable policies that maintain an
ample, reliable supply and reasonable rates while
protecting the state's environment.
Voters shouldn't fall for the scare tactics and
simplistic fixes of Nina Trasoff and Mark Manoil
that could lead Arizona into the same crisis
California created for itself just a few years ago. |